Impact Factor & Ranking

3.0 2.25 1.5 0.75 2.516 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2.516 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
  • 1 50
    #16
  • 1 132
    #47
  • 1 242
    #108
  • 1 77
    #28
  • 1 50
    #17
  • 1 135
    #56
  • 1 247
    #117
  • 1 78
    #35
  • 1 50
    #18
  • 1 139
    #54
  • 1 249
    #122
  • 1 77
    #32
  • 1 51
    #16
  • 1 143
    #56
  • 1 256
    #111
  • 1 82
    #31
  • 1 52
    #13
  • 1 146
    #45
  • 1 260
    #84
  • 1 89
    #30

About Impact Factor & Ranking

Measure of the number of times an average paper in this journal is cited. Copyright Thomson Reuters.

Metrics

Year I.F. Computer science, hardware & architecture Computer science, information systems Engineering, electrical & electronic Telecommunications
2016 2.516 13/52 45/146 84/260 30/89
2015 16/51 56/143 111/256 31/82
2014 18/50 54/139 122/249 32/77
2013 17/50 56/135 117/247 35/78
2012 16/50 47/132 108/242 28/77

Definition

Impact Factor

The Journal Impact Factor is published each year by Thomson Reuters. It is a measure of the number of times an average paper in a particular journal is cited during the preceding two years.
For example:

A = the number of times articles published in a specific journal in 2009 and 2010 were cited by journals during 2011.
B = the total number of 'citable items' published by that journal in 2009 and 2010. ('Citable items' are usually articles, reviews, proceedings, etc.; not editorials or letters-to-the-editor.)

2011 impact factor = A/B.

Actual value is intentionally only displayed for the most recent year. Earlier values are available in the Journal Citation Reports from Thomson Reuters

ISI ranking

Journals are often ranked by Impact Factor in an appropriate Thomson Reuters subject category. As there are now two Impact Factors published – two-year and five-year Impact Factors – this rank may differ, so care is needed when assessing these ranked lists to understand which of the two metrics is being used. In addition, journals can be categorized in multiple subject categories, giving them different ranks for each subject. Consequently, a rank should always be in context to the subject category.